On November 4th,
Iranian lawyer and the 2003 Nobel Laureate announced that the United States and
Europe should ban Iran from using broadcast satellites.
Censor them, is what this ‘human rights’ advocate is suggesting. Shocking as this is, given Ebadi’s track
record, the call for censorship comes as no surprise. She is, after all, a former judge.
During the
brutal dictatorship of the Shah of Iran, Ebadi was a judge (she managed to
become a “judge” with an undergrad degree – without legal practice experience,
simply by passing a ‘qualification exam to become a judge!).
One can only surmise what the ‘qualification exam’ consisted of,
however, a cursory look at the political environment of the time may shed light
on the judgeship qualifications of Ebadi.
Ebadi, today’s
‘human rights’ activist, enjoyed the status and privileges of a judge at a time
when the Shah’s secret police (SAVAK) trained by the CIA and Mossad , engaged in
brutal torture. According to Amnesty International, the methods included
“whipping and beating, electric shocks, extraction of teeth and nails,
boiling water pumped into the rectum, heavy weights hung on the testicles, tying
the prisoner to a metal table heated to a white heat, inserting a broken bottle
into the anus, and rape." As one of
its many “friendly” dictators, the US covered up the crimes with
censorship.
The United
States did more than train torturers and keep it under wraps. But the US did much more for its pet dictator. Right up until the 1979 Iranian Revolution, “the CIA worked with SAVAK, the shah's secret
police, to destroy "antishah" elements in the Iranian student
community in the United States. The CIA and SAVAK set up a front group called the
International Association of Patriotic Students (IAPS), which organized
demonstrations in favor of the shah and beat up students who differed with their
view of the ruler.” Ebadi’s judgeship
remained in tact, as did human rights violations, and the censorship of these
crimes. Judge Ebadi was silent – engulfed in a culture of abuse and censorship. The 1979
Iranian Revolution put an end to her career as a judge. She
was forced to practice law instead of passing judgment!
After
the Revolution, Ebadi sank into
obscurity – and resurfaced in 2002. She
appeared in the headlines as the Founder of ‘Defenders of Human Rights
Center’. Their website states: “Defenders of Human
Rights Center (http://www.humanrights-ir.org/english/) was first established in
Iran in 2002 at the initiative of the Nobel Peace Laureate Shiring
[sic]Ebadi”. Ebadi was given the Noble
Peace prize in 2003. No longer a judge,
Ebadi dedicated her time to defending the rights of all those opposed to the
Islamic Republic of Iran at the exclusion
of the rights of all Iranians and Iran. She
was awarded a Nobel Peace prize in 2003.
The Nobel gave her the
necessary platform to undermine the government in Tehran - at a cost to the
Iranian nation. In 2010, this
‘human rights’ attorney displayed a total disregard for human life and
international law as reported
by Foreign Policy. Referring to sanctions, Ebadi “insisted” that
“Iranians will endure considerable hardship if they think the endgame is greater
respect for human rights”.
This
‘human rights advocate and attorney
further opined that the United States should use VOA and Radio Farda to
reach Iranians inside Iran '”to convince them
that the sanctions are targeted at the regime and not the ordinary
Iranians”. (Perhaps she is of the
opinion that had VOA broadcasted into Iraq, the lives of 500,000 children would
have been spared by sanctions. ) However, in spite of daily broadcast into
Iran, sanctions continue to take lives.
No amount of radio wave has managed to save lives.
So while Ebadi, former
judge, ‘human rights’ advocate,
recommends the violation of a bilateral agreement - the Algiers Accords, Point I.1 of which
states: “The United States pledge that it is and from now will be the policy of
the United States not to intervene, directly or indirectly, politically or
militarily, in Iran’s internal affairs.” ( Per Article VI of the Algiers
Accords, the violated party, Iran, has the right to refer the matter to the
Tribunal at Hague, the Netherlands, where the International Court of Justice
will have jurisdiction) by encouraging US government broadcasts into Iran, she
is calling for the censorship of Iranian broadcast .
In 2010, Ebadi
[wishfully] predicted the end of the Islamic Republic and a new start for her. Her hopes were dashed with the election of
Rohani and the popular support behind him.
But clearly her ambition is unchecked.
As such, one has to wonder what will be the next game plan for this ‘human
rights’ activist who advocates death (sanctions) and censorship.
No comments:
Post a Comment