Monday, March 25, 2019

Media and Trump Victory

Shortly after Donald Trump secured the Presidency,  an Iranian media outlet asked me what contributed to his win.  In light of the Guardian piece today, it is worthwhile posting my interview here.

Trump’s Victory 

As surprising as Trump’s victory may have seemed, it would be a mistake to attribute this win to a single issue, just as it would be wrong to ignore the players behind the scene. 

The ideology among those who supported Trump was not uniform or unanimous.    Trump found support among those who opposed the social changes which contradicted their social and religious values foremost abortion and LGBT.  His main supporting block, the Evangelicals, even overlooked his character flaws such as his numerous marriages and womanizing.  Their support of Trump was due to his pro-Israel, pro-settlements and his anti-Islam stance.  Added to the mix was the undeniable racism of some of his supporters.  The White supremacists and the Christian Supremacists (embodied in his Vice President Mike Pence) were a solid block.    

Poverty played a big role.  It was the poverty and lack of jobs and opportunities that triggered anti-immigration by many of his supporters.  At a time of declining living standards, the number 1 culprit is perceived to be the immigrants ‘who take jobs

away’.  While the previous administration presented a picture of job and economy 
improvement, an independent academic study (2015) found that America was in economic decline.  

Some of the report’s finding made interesting comparisons such as America’s child poverty levels are worse than in any developed country anywhere, including Greece, and eastern European nations such as Poland, Lithuania and Estonia.   Median adult wealth was ranked 27th behind Cyprus, Taiwan and Ireland, and life satisfaction ranked America 12th (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2622722)


These ongoing elements prompted Trump supporters to vote for someone outside of Washington.   This gives an interesting twist to the role the media played in the election.

During the campaign, Donald Trump was front and center in the mainstream media.   The more the media marginalized him, the stronger his base grew.   I continue to ponder over and question media’s role.   It would appear that they tried to marginalize Trump.   A very old video in which Trump suggests groping women was ‘dug up’ and aired continuously.  What has baffled me is the fact that those who looked for and exposed this tape failed to expose the interview tape of Donald Trump aired on September 11, 2001 immediately after 911 in which he states  
clearly that there must have been demolition material in the basement. (bombs)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w
Revelations of this video would have ended his candidacy, but it was not revealed.  Further, his promotion and endorsement and support of Netanyahu in 2013 was not aired either https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm5Je73bYOY  Though perhaps this latter was less consequential had it been aired, it would demonstrate to the ‘intellectuals’ looking for an ‘isolationist’ candidate who would not support wars to think twice about Trump and the continuity of US policies.

We have to ask why the media and anti-Trump faction did not find and reveal
reveal these videos (I had seen them prior to the elections).

Attention must also be drawn to social media.   We live in a world where social media, especially Twitter and Facebook have been behind color revolutions (generally referred to as Arab Spring).   Twitter diplomacy was first coined in 2011 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_diplomacy) it was actually used against Iran in 2009.  Those tweets attributed to Iranians  inside Iran in the aftermath of the 2009 elections were traced back to Israel.  (“Wired Magazine” “Iran: Before You Have That Twitter-Gasm…). 

What is important to remember about Trump and his ‘Twitter Diplomacy’ is the fact that it was promoted by the mainstream media (as with all other cases where twitter is used for an agenda).

In the interest of brevity, it must be concluded that Trump owes his win to the disenfranchised, the poor, the jobless, the racist, and yes, the media!



Sunday, March 10, 2019

Netanyahi: "Israel not a state of all its citizens"

Could Benjamin Netanyahu be more clear?

"Israel is not a state of all its citizens."   "According to the basic nationality law we passed, Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people - And only it.".

This reminded me of an incident at college in 2004 when I was an undergrad.  I wrote a piece on it and at the time, USC had a very progressive individual who was editor of "The Trojan".  My piece was published, but "The Trojan" has long ceased being printed though the very lightweight and superficial  "Daily Trojan" continues.....

Netanhay's words prompted me to look back at my 2004 essay (reprinted here).


Academic Freedom – A Double-Edged Sword



So when we have a fascist on campus teaching Middle East politics who invites other like-minded fascists and bigots to the sanctity of our classroom, what are we to do?  Do we sacrifice our graduation deadline and drop the course? Overlook our principles by continuing with the class while becoming a little more silent every day, and in my case, feeling the affects of it on my health and sanity?



The deception that lay lurking under professor Nabulsi’s smile first hit me when he passionately and categorically announced that all terrorists were Moslems.  What an assault on a religion, I thought.   Hello... did he take an amnesia pill that caused him to draw a blank on Timothy McVeigh blowing up half of Oklahoma City?  Maybe Aum Shinrikyo doesn’t factor in – they are, after all, just Japanese terrorists. FARC, in Columbia, are most definitely Christian.  IRA and ETA are Christians too.  Is this man being hateful or just stupid?  I thought I would just correct him this time, after all, he is a professor and I am the undergrad; and it may be that  I had taken courses in terrorism and  he had not.  Not being of a stingy disposition, I would share my information with him and the class.



But then, he moved onto Iran as his next subject of attack.  With confidence, he made the statement that Iran is the “leader of world Moslem fanatics.”  I thought someone ought to let him know that the Taliban were (are) far worse, and were created thanks to the help of the U.S.  Of course, no one can beat the life style of the Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia.  At least in Iran the women vote, they can hold seats in the parliament, the Noble Peace Prize winner was a woman, and yes, the Iranian envoy to the world economic forum at Davos was the Vice President, a female.  She was no match for the stunning Angelina Jolie, but she was there representing her state as a female politician.  I wonder if Nabulsi knows where Davos is!



I decided to talk to him one on one – in his office.  Didn’t help much.  He thought I only object to the information he is giving out in class because I am afraid that people would realize how bad Iran really is and there would be mounting anti-Iranian feelings.  What an idiot this man is – he really doesn’t know anything.  There’s already plenty of anti-Iranian feeling going around.  In fact, it is considered to be the most disliked country by Americans, at least, according to a recent CNN poll.  But CNN is another story.



Next on Nabulsi’s assault list were the Palestinian people.  For this purpose, he had a fascist diplomat from Israel. The diplomat, with a poorly made tupe (hair-piece) and a badly stained suit, proudly announced--as if he had come by a brilliant realization--that the Palestinian population should not be allowed to go over 20%, for then it would become 30%, then 40% and so on.  He said that if it exceeded 20%, it would lead to civil war and then gave examples of civil wars in the Middle East, being careful to emphasize that Muslims were always involved:  Lebanon, the 8-year Iran-Iraq war (funny, I always thought that was an interstate war!), Sudan (that one, I thought, was in Africa), Yugoslavia (I guess Europe is now part of the Middle East), Russia (they moved borders lately?).  So I asked this “Diplomat” how he proposed to solve the Palestinian problem, by gassing them, sterilization, or what other method, and, secondly, why he had left out Rwanda in his list of ‘Middle-East’ civil wars? 



His answer was: “You misunderstood me, the Israeli population will also grow,” and “I left out Rwanda because I was talking about the wars in the Middle East, Rwanda is in Africa.”  Boy, he must have been told by Nabulsi that we are really dumb in that class.



A couple of days after the “diplomat’s” visit, Nabulsi walked in proudly and announced that “the diplomat did not have a solution for the Palestinian problem.”  He gave a whole bunch of statistics, compared the Palestinians to the French Canadians, and gave us his “solution” which entailed sending those Israeli Arabs who would fight for their fellow Palestinians out of Israel and into the West Bank.  I later found out that his “solution” comes from a book he has us read, and this little man takes credit—if you can take credit for bigotry—for other people’s ideas.



Of course, he is careful to cover his bases by always saying this is my opinion.  And as long as the students are not denied the chance to voice their opinion, then the school has done its part.  But there is more to it than that.  Is the school not responsible for selecting decent professors who are not only qualified, but have the moral capacity to teach.  Where is common decency and humanity?  At what point does the expression of one’s ideas infringe upon the right of others? 



We are here to learn values and become problem solvers.  I really don’t care if a Jew, a Moslem, Hindu, black or white is being attacked, it just shouldn’t happen.  Instead, we should all put on our armor, waxed with high morals, and fight bigotry and defend the least privileged link in the human chain.  The strong don’t need our support; it is the weak and down-trodden that need protection.  If we let go of this principle, we lose sight of humanity.  What this man is teaching in his lectures, as I tried to explain through the appropriate channels (which fell on deaf ears) is social Darwinism.  Survival of the fittest may work for some, but it is a very lonely concept. We can do better.



The silver lining is that this professor was a last minute substitute.  Let’s hope this is his last teaching assignment.  My message to him: Nabulsi, snap out of it, get a life, but not here.  Apply for a job at Fox.  Your racist bile doesn’t belong in the academia.