Sanctioned Terrorism
In 2013, I was invited to speak at a conference in Tehran on the topic of terrorism. Regrettably, none of the speakers covered the topic of terrorism sanctioned by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). The reality is that the UNSC is the only un-democratic entity that gives license to terror – without ever facing consequences. And we still fail to recognize this act of terrorism – America’s weapon of choice. We call it sanctions.
It is way past time for us to wake up to the reality that
terrorism must not necessarily involve blood and carnage. Yes, images of the
atomic bombs dropped on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately killing
120,000 civilians continue to shock us. The images haunt us and shame us. But
there are no shocking images of the 500,000 Iraqi children that were killed
with sanctioned terrorism. We were horrified and reacted to the drone strike
that killed 7 innocent Afghan children, but we are silent and therefore
complicit in the terrorizing of innocent children and adults who suffer as a
result of America’s sanctioned terror all over the world.
The world must unite in fighting the ruthless but cowardly
terrorists who continue their reign of terror; their weapon of mass murder that
they dub ‘diplomacy’. The foremost state sponsor of terror, the United States,
pledges COVID vaccines to the very same people whose well-being and security it
is undermining or killing with terrorism – sanctions. By every
definition, sanctions are
an act of terrorism. You don’t see the blood, you don’t see the wreckage. Maybe
you don’t want to hear the number of casualties pile up. But terrorism has no
borders, no boundaries. It may spare you today. Tomorrow you may well be the
victim.
Understand terrorism – call it out by its name. Shame it and stop
it.
Who is a terrorist? Undoubtedly, what comes to mind is Daesh
(ISIL), al-Qaeda, MKO, Boko Haram, etc. What is terrorism? The events of 9/11
and the gruesome beheadings carried out by Daesh shape our visual perception of
terrorism. What is left unmentioned and unrecognized in our collective psyche
is the kind of terrorism that has been deliberately obfuscated: sanctioned
terrorism or terrorism with a license—sanctions.
The fact that scholars have identified over 100 definitions of the
term terrorism demonstrates that there is no universally accepted definition.
There is general consensus that terrorism is “viewed as a method of violence in
which civilians are targeted with the objective of forcing a perceived enemy
into submission by creating fear, demoralization, and political friction in the
population under attack.” i
In 1937, the League of Nations Convention defined terrorism as
“All criminal acts directed against a State and intended or calculated to create
a state of terror in the minds of particular persons or a group of persons or
the general public.”
Article 1.2 of The
Arab Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism signed in Cairo in 1998
describes terrorism as: “Any act or threat of violence, whatever its motives or
purposes, that occurs for the advancement of an individual or collective
criminal agenda, causing terror among people, causing fear by harming them, or
placing their lives, liberty or security in danger, or aiming to cause damage
to the environment or to public or private installations or property or to
occupy or to seize them, or aiming to jeopardize a national resource”.
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the UN Security
Council adopted Resolution 1373, licensing the United States to wage war
against terrorism without first defining terrorism. Security Council Resolution 1373,
the Counter-Terrorism Committee, and the Fight Against Terrorism | American
Journal of International Law | Cambridge Core, however, Section 1.B
of 18 U.S. Code § 2331 on
international terrorism includes the following: (i) to intimidate or coerce a
civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by
intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by
mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping. In spite of these clear
definitions, sanctions—sanctioned terrorism is dubbed as “diplomacy”, “an
alternate to war”, etc.
The reality of sanctioned terrorism is denied even by the UN from whence the most important definition of terrorism was delivered in a seminal speech by Kofi Annan, the former Secretary-General of the United Nations. Annan conveyed the findings of a high-level UN panel “A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility”(2004)ii as having defined terrorism to be: “[A]ny action intended to kill or seriously harm civilians or non-combatants, with the purpose of intimidating a population or compelling action by a government or international organization”.
Shamelessly, even after sanctioned terrorism took the life of one million Iraqis, the UNSC licensed terrorism against Iran—sanctions, without any remorse for the lost lives of one million Iraqi victims of sanctioned terrorism and untold numbers of other victims across the globe.
The terror inflicted by way of sanctions could not have been made
more clear than what Kofi Annan reported of the 2004 UN panel’s findings
stating that prevention was a vital part of any strategy to protect people
against terrorism adding that “in today’s world, any threat to one is truly a
threat to all” and that “any event or process that leads to deaths on a large
scale or the lessening of life chances, and which undermines states as the
basic unit of the international system, should be viewed as a threat to
international peace and security. Such threats included “economic and social threats”.iii
“Security” in terms of international relations is understood to be
human security. There are six sectors to security: physical, military,
economic, ecological, societal, and political. Any change from “secure” to
“insecure” or a general deterioration in any one or more of these sectors,
increases the potential for violence (Buzan 2009). In spite of it all, the UNSC
licensed terrorism.
The overall failure to identify and deliberately obfuscate this
act of terrorism has enabled this premeditated act of terrorism to continue
with impunity. The success of this deception is owed to controlling the
narrative with complicity from the media. This has been so effective that even
the victims of sanctioned terrorism fail to grasp that they are being subjected
to terrorism. As Walter Laquer famously wrote in his 1977 piece “Terrorism”:
“The success of a terrorist operation depends almost entirely on the amount of
publicity it receives.” Sanctioned terrorism has received no publicity.
Our present day understanding of terrorism was initially
introduced by Hollywood that often borrows its story ideas from the U.S.
foreign policy agenda and has at times reinforced these policies. Hollywood
rarely touched the topic of terrorism in the late 1960s and 1970s when the
phenomenon was not high on the U.S. foreign policy agenda, in news headlines or
in the American public consciousness. In the 1980s, in the footsteps of the
Reagan administration, the commercial film industry brought terrorist villains
to the big screen, making terrorism a blockbuster film product in the 1990s,
painting Arabs (and now Moslems) as terrorists.iv Thus the movie
industry-defined and projected terrorism to the world at large in a manner
consistent with US foreign policy. The news media continues to play an even
bigger role.
News media has consistently framed terrorism by presenting sudden,
shocking scenes of carnage and blood in order to shock the viewer and drive
home the narrative of what terrorism should entail—by implication, ruling out
all other terrorist acts. So while the imagery creates fear and loathing, and a
total rejection of terrorism as identified by the media, a parallel loathing of
unidentified terrorism—of sanctioned terrorism has been deliberately precluded.
This is propaganda at its finest.
It goes without saying that the aim of propaganda is to change
people’s opinions and attempt to influence their future actions and decisions.
What is common about propaganda is that it seldom shows the situation from
different points of view and seldom gives the full picture. Images of
sanctioned terrorism are sorely missing from the picture as the culprits make
every effort to present sanctions as diplomacy, a tool of statecraft, and have
even convinced the general public that it is a better alternative to war. In
fact, sanctioned terrorism is the cowardly alternative to war for the victim is
deprived of an unidentifiable enemy to fight. Sanctions, like other terrorists,
don’t wear military uniforms.
It is incumbent upon every individual opposed to terrorism to take
ownership of the falsely presented narrative about sanctions and refer to sanctions
as sanctioned terrorism at all times. Terrorism, like pollution, does not
recognize boundaries. Russia has learned this the hard way. By Hillary
Clinton’s own admission, the terrorists America is fighting today were created
by the US. We cannot send our uniformed men and women to fight unidentified
terrorism, sanctions. We must be the champions of this war on terror. Whether
we want to speak for yesterday’s victims or defend today’s victims of
sanctioned terrorism, or whether we want to prevent future victims, we must
fight sanctioned terrorism today.
Sanctioned Terrorism (syrianews.cc)
[i] Alex P. Schmid, Albert J. Jongman, et al., Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories, and Literature, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1988, pp. 5-6.
[iii] Kofi Annan, “Special Report: Courage to fulfill our
responsibilities”, The Economist Intelligence Unit, December 4, 2004.
[iv] Helena Vanhala
– “Hollywood portrayal of modern international terrorism in
blockbuster action-adventure films: From the Iran hostage crisis to September
11, 2001”. Dissertations and theses. University of Oregon; 2005.
No comments:
Post a Comment