There can be no liberty when deception is the governing tool. CommonSense aims to expose misinformation.
Saturday, August 12, 2017
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Egypt, el-Sisi, the Nile, and Treason
Interview
What is happening with el-Sisi and Egypt has broad implications.
Gone are the days when wars were fought over oil.
What is happening with el-Sisi and Egypt has broad implications.
Gone are the days when wars were fought over oil.
Sunday, July 23, 2017
Colonizing the Saudi Women
When I repeatedly say that Saudi's time is coming to an end, I am not taken seriously. This production is not about 'women's rights', it is about women in Saudi Arabia being "Westernized" - two very distinctly different issues The US (and prior to that other Western colonizers) has always used women as a central issue to disrupt a government. It specifically even suggested using "music" (mostly hip-hop) to reach the Arab and Moslem youth. Women are key to colonizing a society (cultural colonization which is followed by full scale neocolonial).
So while AJ may publish this (and I am glad they did) out of hostilities between the countries, one must also view this with a different perspective and what the message of the video actually is - and the goal of it.
I have zero tolerance for the Saudi leaders and the heinous crimes they have committed against other nations - and continue to commit, including genocide. That said, I am firmly against foreign interference in the internal dynamics of a country.
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
interview on Egypt Africa Middle East
I had a very interesting interview with Salaamedia from Africa. Frankly, it is rare for me to enjoy interviews (and focus for long!). But the host Inayet was superb. Very well informed and made it easy and pleasurable to talk.
Egypt and broader implications
Egypt and broader implications
Tuesday, June 27, 2017
El-Sisi: Egypt’s Antihero And The Broader Regional Implications
“You can’t make war in the Middle East without Egypt and
you can’t make peace without Syria.” -
Henry Kissinger
In Egyptian mythology,
gods were considered heroes. In
more modern times, it is men who are the heroes. Without a doubt, General Gamal Abdul Nasser has
secured his legacy as a hero - a revolutionary who fought for Egypt and strived
for Arab unity against Israel and Western imperialism. This month marks the 50th
anniversary of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war; a pre-planned war of aggression and
expansion by Israel against Egypt, Jordan, and Syria, aided by the US and
Britain.
Israel’s cronies assisted in the planning and execution of
the war which led to the seizure and
occupation of East Jerusalem, the West Bank, Syria Golan (Golan Heights) and
the Sinai Peninsula. Prior to the start
of the war, as early as May, Lyndon Johnson who assumed the presidency after the
tragic assassination of JF Kennedy, authorized air shipment of arms to Israel[i]. Furthermore, the United States facilitated Israeli air attacks and
advances by sending reconnaissance aircraft to track movement of Egyptian
ground forces and American spy satellites provided imagery to Israel [ii]. According to reports American and British carrier-based aircraft flew sorties
against the Egyptians and U.S. aircraft attacked Egypt. Judging by their cover-up, the American
leadership had as little compassion for American blood as it did for Arab
blood. The Israeli attack against USS
Liberty that killed and injured American servicemen was buried in a sea of
lies.
Fifty years on, the war rages on and Israel
has a different set of cronies. In sharp
contrast to Nasser, el-Sisi, Egypt’s antihero has thrown his lot in with Israel
and Saudi Arabia against his Arab brethren. El-Sisi’s betrayal has been so outlandish and
stark that even the neocon
leaning New York Times published a scathing article titled: “Egypt’s
Lost Islands, Sisi’s Shame” by Adhaf Soueif. This is a remarkable piece rarely seen in the
pages of the NYT given its reputation (see LOOT for example).
Soueif rightly calls el-Sisi’s to task for handing over the Tiran and Sanafir Islands at the mouth of Gulf
of Aqaba to Saudi Arabia. More telling
is the fact that the transfer had been discussed with, and had received the
blessings of Israel, according to Israel’s
Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon. The implications of an Israeli-Saudi-Egyptian
alliance are enormous; though hardly the first act of treason by el-Sisi.
In his article Soueif also touches on
the dam being built by Ethiopia (the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam) which was
opposed to by former President Mohamed Morsi who was ousted in a coup
by el-Sisi. It is crucial that this
project be further explored as it relates not only to Egypt, but also the past
and future politics and geopolitics of the region.
Before moving on however, it is important to recall that Morsi was democratically
elected to office in the aftermath of the Egyptian ‘revolution’. His support of the Palestinians and his
opposition to the dam did not sit well with Israel. Morsi had even called “Jews
descendants of pigs and apes”. Both
HAMAS and the U.S.-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas welcomed Morsi’s
election. Abbas called Morsi "the
choice of the great people of Egypt" while one of his senior aides, Saeb
Erekat, said the democratic vote for Morsi "meant the Palestinian cause
was the Number
One priority for all Egyptians".
Though perhaps the greater concern for Israel was Morsi’s opposition to
the construction of the dam. A
construction favored by Israel and Saudi
Arabia.
In 2012, it was reported
that Saudi Arabia had claimed a stake in the Nile. Israel’s ambitions went much further
back. First initiated by Theodore Herzl
in 1903, the diversion plan was dropped due to British and Egyptian opposition
to it only to be picked up again in the 1970s. At that time, Israeli’s idea was to convince
Egypt to divert Nile water to Israel. In
1978, President Anwar Sadat “declared in Haifa to the Israeli public that he
would transfer Nile water to the Negev. Shortly afterward, in a letter to
Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, Sadat promised that Nile water would go
to Jerusalem. During Mubarak’s presidency,
published reports indicated that Israeli experts were helping Ethiopia to plan
40 dams along the Blue Nile.”[iii]
On May 30, 2013, The Times of Israel
reported that the construction on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (on the
Blue Nile) had sparked a major diplomatic crisis with Egypt. The article also reported (citing Al-Arabiya)
that Major General Mohammed Ali Bilal, the deputy chief of staff of the
Egyptian Armed Forces, had said Egypt was not in a position to confront the
project (countries). “The only solution
lies in the US intervening to convince Ethiopia to alleviate the impact of the
dam on Egypt.” No such solutions from
the U.S.
On June 3rd,
Morsi
met with his cabinet to discuss the dam and its implications. Cabinet members were surprised to learn that
the meeting was aired live. During
the meeting, a cabinet member said: “Imagine what 80 million of us would do
to Israel and America if our water was turned off”. Morsi contended that “We have very serious
measures to protect every drop of Nile water.”
With el-Sisi’s “democratic coup”
which was handsomely rewarded,
the dam project is on schedule to be completed by year’s end. As Israel has expands and accelerates its
wars of aggression, the wider implications of el-Sisi’s will reverberate
throughout the region as serve-serving Arab leaders fight their own to execute
Israel’s agenda.
[i]
Camille Mansour. “Beyond Alliance: Israel and U.S.
Foreign Policy” Columbia 1994, p.89
[ii] Stephen J. Green. “Taking Sides: America's Secret Relations
With A Militant Israel”. William Morrow
and Co., NY 1984
[iii]
“Will Nile water go to Israel? North Sinai
pipelines and the politics of scarcity”, Middle
East Policy (Sep 1997): 113-124.
Monday, June 19, 2017
High Level Leaks a "Conspiracy"?
In his article, Phil Giraldi argues there may be a dangerous conspiracy at work ( "Do High-Level Leaks Suggest a Conspiracy" ). I think we are all looking at things (including Phil's article) with a degree of intelligence and integrity. These are absent in the world of "governing" (if you want to call it that) and America's power projection. It may well be that this mad man was somehow enabled to carry out exactly what he is doing. Deepening the mess in Syria and the Middle East, Afghanistan, emboldening Saudis, writing a blank check for Israeli atrocities, and allowing America to OPENLY giving a finger to the world. After all, intimidating the world with a mad, unpredictable man is in itself a tactic. Maybe this is a lesson learnt from North Korea, though personally I give the thumbs up to the North Koreans. But we all know that the president does not formulate the foreign policy agenda. If America fails to achieve its various goals with Trump, the plan 'B' is to impeach him (which is in the works). This will enable the US to "reset" and give the false illusion of a 'transparent democracy'. A food for thought: During the presidential campaign, the media managed to dig up an old 'sex' tape of his, but failed to dig up or show Trump stating that there was demolition at the towers on 911. Doesn't seem odd to anyone? Also food for thought: his tweets then and now would all be but ignored were it not for the media. So you have to wonder why the media is promoting them (even in the negative) just as it is promoting ISIS.
Tuesday, June 13, 2017
America Supports Terrorists
Have doubts? Lets take the most recent examples and forget about the past decades. Donald Trump wrote in his book Time to Get Tough: Making
America #1 Again.: "Then look at Saudi
Arabia. It is the world's biggest funder of terrorism. Saudi Arabia funnels our
petro dollars—our very own money—to fund the terrorists that seek to destroy
our people, while the Saudis rely on us to protect them!" He then sold them billions worth of arms to the "funder of terrorism".
Today, the United States permitted shipment of more than $500 million in precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) actually suggested who should be targeted by the terrorists. Praising the ISIS attack against Iran, Rohrabacher stated: "“Isn’t that a good thing?” he said. “And if so, maybe this is a Trump — maybe it’s a Trump strategy of actually supporting one groups against another, considering that you have two terrorist organizations."
Can the US make it any more clear that it supports terrorists? Is it any wonder they all line up for handouts from the US?
Today, the United States permitted shipment of more than $500 million in precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) actually suggested who should be targeted by the terrorists. Praising the ISIS attack against Iran, Rohrabacher stated: "“Isn’t that a good thing?” he said. “And if so, maybe this is a Trump — maybe it’s a Trump strategy of actually supporting one groups against another, considering that you have two terrorist organizations."
Can the US make it any more clear that it supports terrorists? Is it any wonder they all line up for handouts from the US?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)