Again Turkey

Turkey’s role in Syria is deplorable and they should be blamed for supporting and enabling terrorists to cross border, including McCain.  But I also think they are setting up Erdogan for a more pliable client.    Turkey is important in the plans/plot, especially in putting pipelines for water through Syria as planned in 2000,  and maybe Erdogan was resisting by challenging Israel.

 I also have no doubt that Fethullah Gülen is behind all this; extremely powerful, lives in the US, is a major player in Turkey, and BLAMES Turkey for the Flotilla incident since he is in bed with Israel.

This putting the blame on Turkey which came into circulation in Sy's piece blows me away, and it also acts as a divergent taking attention away from those who may truly be complicit.  I don't even think it was the Saudis, though they arm and fund the terrorists.   I wrote in an article much earlier: "According to the UN report two types of rockets had been used, including an M14 artillery rocket bearing Cyrillic markings and a 330-millimeter rocket of unidentified origin – though perhaps not so unidentified. Shortly after the August incident, Foreign Policy published and made mention of these mysterious rockets which according to former UN inspectors bore a strong resemblance to a 1970’s American weapon—the SLUFAE . Although SLUFAE had been shelved, the concept was built upon by several countries—namely Israel. According to the former UN inspector, "a very similar munition was found 3-5 years ago, during one of the Israeli excursions," into Southern Lebanon”. Further, there is the strong possibility that the rockets with Cyrillic markings (attributed to the Soviets) can be traced back to the “Bear Spares” program.

Both Israel and Egypt made the "Bear Spares" program feasible – major contributors.  Neither has their chemical weapons under scrutiny  - have not signed the chemical weapons treaty.  Both had the opportunity, but since Israel supplied the "intelligence" to the US and gave them the "proof" in the form ofthe "conversation" making Syria complicit, I am confident Israel is responsible.  

Let us not forget why Syria was targeted, who planned it, and who executed the plan.   Do not take away from that responsibility by readily accepting everything that may be music to your ears. 

Western Compassion and the Boko Haram

1998 Clinton’s national security agenda made it clear that unhampered access to Nigerian oil and other vital resources was a key US policy.  Push for African oil was on Dick Cheney’s desk on May 31, 2000. IASPS (Israeli think tank) in 2002 suggested American push toward African oil .  the same year Boko Haram was established.

AFRICOM in 2007 helped consolidate this push into the region.  2010 International energy outlook considered West Coast of Africa to be the new oil frontier.

Nigeria second biggest recipient of Africa funds from international military education and training.    Obama administration increased the aid by 30%.  The objective has been to build capacity of local security forces to suppress domestic and regional forces who challenge the US plans .

US positioning itself to use military force to make sure African oil flows to the US.

Washington understands better than anyone that the simplest way to ramp-up a military presence in any region is to create a public enemy.  Voila, you have one in Nigeria.

Curious that Jacob Zenn gave the link to the video to CNN.  How odd that someone so opposed to Western Education should use Western means and a Washington Foundation – the Jamestown foundation established in 1984 to recruit Soviet dissidents for propagating its message!

Link to interview on this:  

Press TV interview on Boko Haram

Nuland Propaganda - RT April 8, 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRUAePGUAWc&feature=youtu.be

Boko Haram Propaganda Update!

We now know who gave the video to CNN (at least the latest one)! "Days after the Bama raid, Boko Haram's Shekau appeared in a video that showed the hostages. He warned that if Nigerian security forces "do not release our wives and children, we will not release theirs," and the hostages would become his "servants," according to Zenn, PROVIDED CNN WIHT A LINK to the video! Please do a Google search to find a picture of Jacob Zenn, Kippah and all! 

Zenn works for Jamestown Foundation, established to to recruit anti-Soviet dissidents. now, Jamestown simply 'enlightens' us! 
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/12/world/boko-haram-previous-abductions/?hpt=hp_c

The Jamestown Foundation was founded in 1984 after Arkady Shevchenko, the highest-ranking Sovietofficial ever to defect when he left his position as Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, defected in 1978. William Geimer, an American lawyer, had been working closely with Shevchenko, and established the foundation as a vehicle to promote the writings of the former Soviet diplomat and those of Ion Pacepa, a former top Romanian intelligence officer; with the help of the foundation, both defectors published bestselling books. The CIA  Director William J. Casey, a leading figure in national security organizations, helped back the formation of The Jamestown Foundation, agreeing with its complaints that the U.S. intelligence community did not provide sufficient funding of Soviet bloc defectors. The foundation, initially also dedicated to supporting Soviet dissidents, enabled the defectors from the Eastern Bloc to earn extra money by lecturing and writing."

American media has a field day with Boko Haram videos!

The American media is having a field day with this nonsense about Boko Haram – rumored to be CIA backed.   

Back to Islam bashing.   

The video/s of the Boko Haram conveniently forwarded to CNN (!) gives the neocons perfect excuse to put additional boots on the ground in Nigeria to steal their oil as prescribed by the Israeli-based think tank, IASPS who opined in 2002 that the US should turn to Africa for its oil and Israel should control the oil in the Middle East.  How convenient.  http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=African_Oil_Policy_Initiative_Group

A few years later, Chatham House made clear what the intentions are:  http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/87_4stokesraphael.pdf

There is another side to all this – and I have this dire prediction.  I pray that I am wrong – in fact, I hope I am off the wall on this.

A few days ago, the EU asked for an investigation of the Odessa massacre 

http://voiceofrussia.com/2014_05_03/EU-calls-for-independent-inquiry-into-tragic-deaths-of-people-in-Ukraines-Odessa-3662/

Course, this is the same EU that refused to acknowledge and investigate the Maidan sniper shooting in spite of the leaked conversation.  But my feeling is that US/NATO would never admit to a false flag, or admit that their 'guys' - the coup regime and fascist therein are responsible . How would they explain it?  Either blame it on Russia, which no one will buy, or worse, blame it on the Tartars . After all, for over 2 decades the West has created Islamophobia and the ignorant are too ready to accept that Moslems are responsible for ghastly acts.  It would be a way out for all.   The ground work for this was laid.   Here is an excerpt:

"In addition to enthusiastically assisting the German and Romanian invaders with massacring Crimean Jews and hunting down anti-Nazi partisans, Crimean Tatars joined a specially created SS Regiment: Tataren-Gebirgsjäger-Regiment der SS (The Tatar Mountain Jager SS Regiment), akin to the numerous SS divisions, regiments, and brigades made up of Soviet and Balkan Muslims."

https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/brown-revolution-in-ukraine-crimean-tatars-threaten-jihad/  (please read this link).

I believe it is important to keep an eye on these developments.

Link to full interview on Kerry's speech and NATO aggression

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kXTW4DtSbI&feature=youtu.be

NATO surrounding Russia

Interview with RT on Kerry's remarks and NATO surrounding Russia. I regret that only a very small portion of the interview was aired. But I think it is important to reiterate several points -

Isaiah Bowman, a key figure in the Council on Foreign Relations wrote that “The measure of our victory will be the measure of our domination after victory." This was said in1941, but it became far more pertinent in 1991 and what we see the US do today - as it has been doing for decades - shooting for total domination.

True to this, after the Cold War, Prominent Americans such as Wolfowitz, Rustow opined that it was important to contain Russia (the Heartland – Defense Planning Guideline1992, later repeated by Rustow in 1993, and course the well-read Chess Board). It was felt that the domination of Heartland (Eastern Europe, Russia, Central Asia) would lead to domination of the World. 9/11 made this possible and many countries unwittingly cooperated to help America achieve its goal of global domination under its pretext of war on terror.

The renewed containment policy also explains the astronomical amount of US aid to Eastern Europe after the fall of the Soviet Union. This was in the same exact pattern as the Marshall Plan.

The creation of Marshall Plan in 1947 to give aid to war-torn Europe had already pumped $13 billion dollars. This deterrence was to “protect” Europe from falling to Communism, had the added benefit of helping American businesses. While showcasing American generosity, Europe had to turn to the U.S. for its goods which in turn had to be shipped on board American vessels. American economy prospered and communism was kept at bay.

Same concept here with Eastern Europe. The aid was to use these countries as a counter to Russian rise (contain) but also to build a buffer. The most immediate foreign policy objective for the British Empire (passed onto American Empire) was to prevent any kind of alliance or bloc between Germany and Russia, and to keep either one from dominating Eastern Europe. Hence strong buffer states needed to be formed between these two great powers.

Merkel would be foolish to follow America/NATO in yet another adventure as it did Afghanistan, etc. As we can see, NATO, or Western Europe NATO is reluctant to get involved with America’s expansionist agenda, so the Americans are relying on Eastern European countries they have bought. As Donald Rumsfeld said in 2003 (about Iraq), 'Old Europe' will be a problem.

I think and hope that “Old Europe” will be a problem with regard to Ukraine. No wonder Chuck Hagel visited Brussles in 2013 to ask NATO allies to contribute more and not rely on the US which has bought NATO with 75% contributions it makes. Less than a handful of countries have obliged America.

Not only does Kerry want to bolster the domestic image of the Obama administration, but to reassure Eastern Europeans who are aiding the US in its agenda. But Kerry’s huff and puff speech only reflects America’s weak position in this situation. As with Iraq, they love to show that this is a “multi-lateral” effort. Not exactly a strong union!

Perhaps the biggest fear I have, specially with Brennan visiting the coup regime in Ukraine, is false flag operations to win over the reluctant NATO allies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G92vMB9BigY