High Level Leaks a "Conspiracy"?

In his article, Phil Giraldi argues there may be a dangerous conspiracy at work ( "Do High-Level Leaks Suggest a Conspiracy" ). I think we are all looking at things (including Phil's article) with a degree of intelligence and integrity. These are absent in the world of "governing" (if you want to call it that) and America's power projection. It may well be that this mad man was somehow enabled to carry out exactly what he is doing. Deepening the mess in Syria and the Middle East, Afghanistan, emboldening Saudis, writing a blank check for Israeli atrocities, and allowing America to OPENLY giving a finger to the world. After all, intimidating the world with a mad, unpredictable man is in itself a tactic. Maybe this is a lesson learnt from North Korea, though personally I give the thumbs up to the North Koreans. But we all know that the president does not formulate the foreign policy agenda. If America fails to achieve its various goals with Trump, the plan 'B' is to impeach him (which is in the works). This will enable the US to "reset" and give the false illusion of a 'transparent democracy'. A food for thought: During the presidential campaign, the media managed to dig up an old 'sex' tape of his, but failed to dig up or show Trump stating that there was demolition at the towers on 911. Doesn't seem odd to anyone? Also food for thought: his tweets then and now would all be but ignored were it not for the media. So you have to wonder why the media is promoting them (even in the negative) just as it is promoting ISIS.

America Supports Terrorists

Have doubts?  Lets take the most recent examples and forget about the past decades.  Donald Trump wrote in his book Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again.:  "Then look at Saudi Arabia. It is the world's biggest funder of terrorism. Saudi Arabia funnels our petro dollars—our very own money—to fund the terrorists that seek to destroy our people, while the Saudis rely on us to protect them!"  He then sold them billions worth of arms to the "funder of terrorism". 

Today, the United States permitted shipment of more than $500 million in precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia.   

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) actually suggested who should be targeted by the terrorists.  Praising the ISIS attack against Iran, Rohrabacher stated: "“Isn’t that a good thing?” he said. “And if so, maybe this is a Trump — maybe it’s a Trump strategy of actually supporting one groups against another, considering that you have two terrorist organizations."

Can the US make it any more clear that it supports terrorists?   Is it any wonder they all line up for handouts from the US?

WINEP Suggesting False Flag to Start War With Iran

Neocon Patrick Clawson recommending false flag to start war with Iran - 2012

Make Iran Take the First Step to Justify War

2005 - CNN Amanpour telling President Assad about Regime Change

And they want the world to think it was a "civil war"!

Amanpour interview in 2005

US use of nerve gas - on its own troops!

Article from 2015.

The coverup continues.

U.S. Nerve Gas Hit Our Own Troops in Iraq

False Flag in Syria

The warmongers are busy selling the same lies as in 2013 about the allegations of Syrian gas attack.   Plans had been underway to create a 'safe zone' even before Trump got elected.   However, the timing of the allegations are suspicious.   Aside from hoping to give Trump a boost, it also is intended to demonstrate to the world (falsely) that 'ridding of WMD' does not work unless one removes the 'regime'.    This is just as much about Syria as it is about Iran.  The pro-Israel lobby who wants 'regime change' in Iran can now point to Iran and claim that Iran continues to have a "weapons" program.

Syria: The Timing of Strikes

It has always been in the works, but, US presidents rally the crowd behind them when their approval rating falls to an all time low. George W was at 36% jumped after Iraq strikes. Trump was at 35%. Look for polls in the next few days.

Poll numbers after Iraq attack.